🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has transformed since those days, focusing less on the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the observance is celebrated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it evolves is a instructive case in how co-option leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a elected representative gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the United States, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to erase African American heritage and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration illustrates how insufficiently it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that face all if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.